Logo-jcvtr
Submitted: 24 Jun 2014
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)

J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2014;6(2): 111-115.
doi: 10.5681/jcvtr.2014.024
PMID: 25031827
PMCID: PMC4097851
  Abstract View: 1491
  PDF Download: 754

Original Article

Diagnostic Values of Plasma, Fresh and Frozen Urine NT-proBNP in Heart Failure Patients

Mehrnoush Toufan 1, Hossein Namdar 1*, Mohsen Abbasnezhad 1, Afshin Habibzadeh 2, Heidarali Esmaeili 3, Saeid Yaraghi 1, Zhila Samani 1

1 Cardiovascular Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
2 Medical Philosophy and History Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
3 Department of Pathology, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Email: namdar.hn@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: The plasma N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level is animportant diagnostic and prognostic marker of heart failure. Recent studies have suggestedurinary NT-proBNP as a new and simple test for diagnosis of heart failure. We aim to comparediagnostic value of plasma, fresh and frozen urine levels of N-terminal probrain natriureticpeptide (NT-proBNP) for detecting heart failure.Methods: Between January 2010 and January 2012, we measured urine and plasma levels of NTproBNPin 98 patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and 29 age- and sex-matched healthycontrol subjects.Results: There were significant correlations between plasma NT-proBNP and fresh (r=0.45,p<0.001) and frozen (r=0.42, p<0.001) urine NT-proBNP concentrations in CHF patients. Due toreceiver operating curve analysis, fresh and frozen urine NT-proBNP could diagnose HF with areaunder curve (AUC) of 0.73±0.04 (p<0.001) and 0.65±0.05 (p=0.01) with sensitivity and specificityof 73.97%, 58.62%, and 65.31%, 62.07%, for a cut-off of 94.2 and 96 pg/mL, respectively. PlasmaNT-proBNP had greater AUC (0.94±0.02, p<0.001) and better sensitivity and specificity (94.9%,89.66% for cut-off of 414.5 pg/mL). There was no significant correlation between LVEF andplasma, fresh and frozen urine NT-proBNP levels in CHF patients.Conclusion: Plasma NT-proBNP is still the best diagnostic marker with high sensitivity andspecificity; however, urinary especially fresh urine NT-proBNP may be a surrogate to plasma NTproBNPfor diagnosing HF with acceptable accuracy.
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 1492

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 754

Your browser does not support the canvas element.