Shamsi Ghaffari
1, Majid Malaki
2*, Afshin Rezaeifar
2, Shahin Abdollahi Fakhim
31 Cardiovascular Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
2 Pediatric Health Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
3 Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
Abstract
Introduction: Blood pressure( BP )measurement is essential for
epidemiological studies and clinical decisions . It seems that tissue
characters can effect on BP resultso and
we try to find edema effect on BP measured
by three methods of oscillometric , auscultation and arterial .
Method and materials: Blood pressure of 55 children candidated for open heart surgery were measured
and compared with three methods : Arterial as standard and
reference ,oscillometric and
auscultatory . Peripheral edema as an tissue character which defined as higher than +2 as marked edema and equal or lower than +2 considered as no edema . statistical method :Data expressed by Mean (95% of
confidence interval(CI 95%). Comparison between two group was done by T
independent test and ANOVA test for more than two groups. Mann whitney U and
paired T test test used for serially comparisons of methods . P less than 0.05 is significant.
Results: 55 children
aged 29.4±3.9
months ,they divided to two groups 10 children with peripheral edema beyond 2+ and 45 cases without edema. Oscillometric method
overestimate systolic BP the Mean (CI
95%) difference of arterial to oscillomeric was 4.8(8/-1
, p 0.02) in edematous and 4.2(7/1 p 0.004) in non edematous. In diastolic BP
oscillometric method underestimate -9(-1.8/-16.5, p0.03) in edematous group and
2.6(-0.7/+5,p 0.2) in non edematous.
Conclusion : Oscillometric device standards can
not cover all special clinical conditions and age groups .It underestimate diastolic BP significantly in
edematous children, it was 9.2 mmHg in
average as our study.