Logo-jcvtr
Submitted: 06 Oct 2014
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)

J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2014;6(4): 205-210.
doi: 10.15171/jcvtr.2014.013
PMID: 25610550
PMCID: PMC4291597
  Abstract View: 1780
  PDF Download: 818

Original Article

Transcatheter Versus Surgical Closure of Atrial Septum Defect: A Debate from a Developing Country

Waleed T Siddiqui 1, Tariq Usman 2, Mehnaz Atiq 3, Muhammad Muneer Amanullah 2*

1 Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
2 Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH), Karachi, Pakistan
3 Department of Pediatrics, The Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH), Karachi, Pakistan
*Corresponding Author: Email: muneer.amanullah@aku.edu

Abstract

Introduction: This study compares the effectiveness and cost of trans-catheter verses surgicalclosure of secundum atrial septum defect (ASD). ASD accounts for 10% of congenital cardiacdefects. Trans-catheter closure of secundum ASD is increasingly used as the primary intervention.Surgical repair is advised in a proportion of secundum type defects which are unsuitable fordevice closure.Methods: We reviewed the clinical course of 176 patients who underwent closure of isolatedsecundum ASD. The patients were assigned to either the device or surgical group depending uponthe treatment they received. Successful closure was assessed immediately after the procedure. Thefollowing outcomes were studied: mortality, morbidity, hospital stay, and costs.Results: Ninety five patients were in the surgical group and 81 patients were in the groupundergoing device closure. The median age was 14.0 years (range 1.1-61.0) for surgical groupand 24.0 years (range 0.5-68.0) for the device group. The mortality in both groups was 0. Theprocedure success rate was 100% for the surgical group and 96.3% for the device group. Thecomplication rate was 13.7% for surgical group and 7.4% for the device group. The mean lengthof hospital stay was 5.0 ± 2.7 days for surgical group and 3.0 ± 0.4 days for device group. Theprocedure cost for surgery was found to be 12.3% lower than that of trans-catheter closure.Conclusion: Successful closure is achieved by both methods. Trans-catheter closure results inlower rate of complication and hospital stay but the cost of the procedure tends to be higherthan surgery.
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 1781

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 818

Your browser does not support the canvas element.