Logo-jcvtr
Submitted: 26 Mar 2025
Revision: 14 Jul 2025
Accepted: 02 Aug 2025
ePublished: 28 Sep 2025
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)

J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2025;17(3): 188-198.
doi: 10.34172/jcvtr.025.33544
PMID: 41255495
PMCID: PMC12620142
  Abstract View: 178
  PDF Download: 243

Original Article

Transvenous removal of adherent hemodialysis catheters and venous ports – experience of a reference center

Janusz Gozdek 1* ORCID logo, Dorota Nowosielecka 1,2, Wojciech Jacheć 3, Łukasz Tułecki 1, Andrzej Kutarski 3,4

1 Department of Cardiac Surgery, The Pope John Paul II Province Hospital, 22-400 Zamość, Poland
2 Faculty of Health Sciences, Academy of Zamość, Poland
3 2nd Department of Cardiology, Zabrze, Faculty of Medical Science in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Katowice, Poland
4 Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, 20-059 Lublin, Poland
*Corresponding Author: Janusz Gozdek, Email: jgozdek@wp.pl

Abstract

Introduction: Removal of adherent intravascular catheters (hemodialysis catheters and venous ports) is still an unsolved clinical problem lying at the intersection of vascular surgery, anesthesiology, cardiac surgery and cardiology. Analysis of resistant removals of adherent catheters when simple traction was unsuccessful. Description of the technique and effectiveness of catheter removal using mechanical dilatation and dedicated tools.

Methods: Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained computerized database at the reference center. One hundred eleven transvenous catheter extractions (TCE), including 71 hemodialysis catheters and 40 venous ports.

Results: A procedure for removing adherent catheters using mechanical dilatation is described. All catheters were removed in their entirety, there was one major complication (embolization). It is difficult to identify predictors of the need for mechanical dilatation. The main indication for catheter removal is malfunction most frequently due to fibrous encapsulation at catheter tips or adherence of catheter tips to the cardiac structures. The second is catheter-related infection. Most dysfunctional and infected catheters are implanted with improper positioning of the catheter tip beyond the right atrium. Half of seemingly adherent catheters can be removed with simple traction, which is not predictable before the procedure. Moreover, 50% of catheters require dissection of fibrous tissue using additional specialized tools. The effects of mechanical dilatation are very good, if the procedure is performed with participation of operators experienced with transvenous lead extraction. TCE of adherent hemodialysis catheters and venous ports is a safe and effective procedure.

Conclusion: The final result of mechanical dilatation is very good if the procedure is performed with collaboration of operators experienced with transvenous lead extraction. Transvenous removal of adherent hemodialysis catheters and venous ports is safe and effective.


First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 179

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 243

Your browser does not support the canvas element.